The following articles have been recommended for further reading in the field of cancer immunotherapy by JITC's Immunotherapy Biomarker's co-Section Editor Dr. Alexandra Synder.
“The pre-existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients” by Freidrich et al
Cancer Cell (2023)
Abstract:
Bispecific T cell engagers (TCEs) have shown promise in the treatment of various cancers, but the immunological mechanism and molecular determinants of primary and acquired resistance to TCEs remain poorly understood. Here, we identify conserved behaviors of bone marrow-residing T cells in multiple myeloma patients undergoing BCMAxCD3 TCE therapy. We show that the immune repertoire reacts to TCE therapy with cell state-dependent clonal expansion and find evidence supporting the coupling of tumor recognition via major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC class I), exhaustion, and clinical response. We find the abundance of exhausted-like CD8+ T cell clones to be associated with clinical response failure, and we describe loss of target epitope and MHC class I as tumor-intrinsic adaptations to TCEs. These findings advance our understanding of the in vivo mechanism of TCE treatment in humans and provide the rationale for predictive immune-monitoring and conditioning of the immune repertoire to guide future immunotherapy in hematological malignancies.
Why this matters:
In the context of the increasingly widespread testing of TCEs, which have been promising in liquid tumors and are starting to show signals in solid tumors, it is important for the field to understand how and why they are effective. This paper dives into the mechanisms for efficacy of T-cell engagers in multiple myeloma, which may be instructive not only in multiple myeloma but also in other disease settings.
“Trends in the approval of cancer therapies by the FDA in the twenty-first century” by Scott et al
Nat Rev Drug Disc (2023)
Abstract:
The cancer treatment landscape has changed dramatically since the turn of the century, resulting in substantial improvements in outcomes for patients. This Review summarizes trends in the approval of oncology therapeutic products by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from January 2000 to October 2022, based on a categorization of these products by their mechanism of action and primary target. Notably, the rate of oncology indication approvals has increased in this time, driven by approvals for targeted therapies, as has the rate of introduction of new therapeutic approaches. Kinase inhibitors are the dominant product class by number of approved products and indications, yet immune checkpoint inhibitors have the second most approvals despite not entering the market until 2011. Other trends include a slight increase in the share of approvals for biomarker-defined populations and the emergence of tumour-site-agnostic approvals. Finally, we consider the implications of the trends for the future of oncology therapeutic product development, including the impact of novel therapeutic approaches and technologies.
Why this matters:
This review paper examines recent (2000-2022) trends in FDA approvals in oncology; the increase in biomarker-defined and tumor agnostic approvals is noteworthy.
“Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer” by O’Donnell et al
J Clin Oncol (2023)
Abstract:
Purpose – Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC); however, toxicity is substantial, responses are rarely durable, and many patients with la/mUC are ineligible. Each enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab have shown a survival benefit versus chemotherapy in UC, are not restricted by cisplatin eligibility, and warrant investigation as a first-line (1L) combination therapy in patients ineligible for cisplatin.
Methods – In this ongoing phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label study, 1L cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC received enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg once daily on days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab 200 mg (day 1) intravenously once daily in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was safety. Key secondary end points included confirmed objective response rate, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS).
Results – Forty-five patients received enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (55.6%), fatigue (51.1%), and alopecia (48.9%). Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs; the most common were increased lipase (17.8%), maculopapular rash (11.1%), and fatigue (11.1%). One death (2.2%) was classified as a TRAE. The confirmed objective response rate after a median of nine cycles was 73.3% with a complete response rate of 15.6%. The median DOR and median OS were 25.6 months and 26.1 months, respectively.
Conclusion – Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile. Most patients experienced tumor shrinkage. The median DOR and median OS exceeding 2 years in a cisplatin-ineligible patient population make this a promising combination currently under investigation in a phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04223856).
Why this matters:
This study of enfortumab vedotin with or without pembrolizumab demonstrates not only the remarkable activity of the combination but may suggest a path forward for such ADC+CPI combinations.
“Systematic discovery of neoepitope-HLA pairs for neoantigens shared among patients and tumor types” by Gurung et al
Nat Biotechnol (2023)
Abstract:
The broad application of precision cancer immunotherapies is limited by the number of validated neoepitopes that are common among patients or tumor types. To expand the known repertoire of shared neoantigen-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complexes, we developed a high-throughput platform that coupled an in vitro peptide-HLA binding assay with engineered cellular models expressing individual HLA alleles in combination with a concatenated transgene harboring 47 common cancer neoantigens. From more than 24,000 possible neoepitope-HLA combinations, biochemical and computational assessment yielded 844 unique candidates, of which 86 were verified after immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry analyses of engineered, monoallelic cell lines. To evaluate the potential for immunogenicity, we identified T cell receptors that recognized select neoepitope-HLA pairs and elicited a response after introduction into human T cells. These cellular systems and our data on therapeutically relevant neoepitopes in their HLA contexts will aid researchers studying antigen processing as well as neoepitope targeting therapies.
Why this matters:
This study performs a thorough mechanistic evaluation of putative shared neoantigens, advancing the field’s ongoing efforts to evaluate the role of neoantigens in anti-cancer therapies.